Blog article categories (required for publishing)

Blog Articles

Our blog will features articles on bidding, defence and play of the hand as well as general bridge related articles.  Browse our blog categories and be sure to thank our contributors (bloggers) for sharing their wealth of knowledge.

Vul vs not, at Matchpoints, you hold as south: ♠QJ10 A Q63 ♣KQ9765

 

W      N       E       S

-        P       P       1♣    

P       1     2      3♣

P       4♣     P       ?

 

 

What do you bid? At IMPs? With an expert?

 


 

Partner has invited game – do you accept. The first thing to do in this type of situation is to determine if you have:

 

A good hand for your previous bidding.

A bad hand for your previous bidding.

An average hand for your previous bidding.

 

Here I would say average or good. You have 14 HCPs and a singleton, definitely much better than the same hand with three small spades, which is possible. On the other hand, the Q is of questionable value.

 

Another way to try to evaluate a hand is counter losers. Here you have 5, which means partner needs 3 cards to cover your losers. So he needs something like ♠AKxx xxxx xx ♣Axx or ♠Axxxxxxx x ♣Axxx. These are possible hands. But West had a chance to raise diamonds and didn’t so. His silence increases the risk that he has a singleton. If so they may take a ruff and beat 5♣ right off the bat, if partner has something like ♠AKx xxxx xxx ♣Axx

 

So on balance you should pass. This is matchpoints and you want to protect your plus. At teams it is closer. You are vulnerable after all. However bidding game may draw a speculative double. On balance I would pass. What sways me is partner may have wasted values in hearts.

 

Playing with an expert things are easier. With any good invitational hand partner should bid 3. This allows South to show a heart preference, but more importantly a diamond stopper. If partner had ♠Axx QJxx xxx ♣Axx he wants to be in 3NT. 4♣ is more a courtesy raise, in case you have significant more values for your 3♣ bid. Then passing is always easy.

 

 

 

Lessons to Learn

 

 

1)    A free bid of 3♣ here has a wide range, from 11 to a good 15 HCPs, plus distribution.

2)    If South had a stronger high card hand double, not 3♣, is the correct call.

3)    Always consider inferences from bids partner or the opponents do not make.

 

Questions or comments may be sent to me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

 

 

 

Both vul, at IMPs, you hold as south: ♠AK ♥2 ♦QJ109632 ♣AJ3

 

W      N       E       S

-        P       P       1xDx

1xSx P       P       ?

 

Constructive

 

What do you bid?


At IMP scoring, there are two key considerations when deciding whether to reopen after partner passes either your opener, or left-hand opponent’s opener:

 

1.         Allowing the opponents to bid a makeable game.

 

2.          Protect partner on hands where he either doesn’t have the right hand type to enter the auction directly, or he is awaiting a reopening double that he can convert to penalties.

 

Here it doesn’t seem likely partner has a hand in which he is waiting to penalize spades. The clues are West should have a good suit and you are staring at the xSxAK! He may have a hand with long clubs that he was too light to bid 2xCx.

 

So what does he have? He likely has some spade length. He DOES NOT have four hearts with 6+ points or he would have made a negative double.

 

So we know that the opponents have an almost guaranteed heart fit and partner is likely weak.

 

The question that you need to ask yourself then is, ‘Can we beat 4xHx?

 

The answer is no. In addition to having 5+ hearts and some values, East is a strong favourite to have spade shortness since he did not raise.

 

So even though you may give up a part score where you can make 3xDx, you are not giving up game. In the 2014 CNTC playoffs South did balance with 2xDx and the opponents quickly bid up to the cold 4xHx game (two hearts by West, three hearts by East, four hearts by West).

 

The full deal (hands rotated):

 

 

 

 

 

♠ J 10 9 8 5 4
♥ J 9 7
♦ 4
♣ 10 8 6

♠ Q 7 6 3 2
♥ K Q 6 4
♦ A K
♣ K 4

Bridge deal

♠ -
♥ A 10 8 5 3
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q 9 7 5 2

 

♠ A K
♥ 2
♦ Q J 10 9 6 3 2
♣ A J 3

 

 

 

Lessons to Learn

 

 

1)    Make sure you consider whether the opponents can make game, usually in an unbid major, when balancing after opening.

 

2)    An overcaller will often have a very good hand but cannot describe it with one bid. The theory is ‘If I can get by this round of bidding, I am in great shape to describe my hand.’ As such, he is vulnerable to the bidding going all pass.

 

3)    Notice East did not bid when he had a chance. That is because it is unwise to compete when you have a misfit for partner’s primary suit.

 

 

Questions or comments may be sent to me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

 

 

 

E-W vul, at IMPs scoring you hold as South: ♠KQ752 ♥KJ1084 ♦K ♣42

 

W        N         E          S

3♣       P          P          3♠

P          3NT    P          ?

Do you agree with 3xSx?

What do you bid?


 

E-W vul, at IMPs scoring you hold as South: ♠KQ752 KJ1084 K ♣42

 

W        N         E          S

3♣       P          P          3♠

P          3NT    P          ?

Do you agree with 3xSx?

What do you bid?

 


A belated Happy New Year to all readers. Mine started with pneumonia and a stay in the Scottsdale Healthcare Hospital, but I am now on the mend. Way to go Canadian Juniors! Jets, it’s now your turn!

 

There are a couple of choices players would consider over 3♣:

 

Pass.Although a conservative choice, it could easily be right. However at this vulnerability North could easily have a semi-trap pass of 3xCx with a hand such as, ♠x Axxx Qxx ♣K109x.

 

Double. Partner will smile and pass with the hand above. The other plus about double is that brings into play both majors. The downside is you won’t be happy with any diamond bid, and partner’s likely 3NT will be apt to miss a 5-3 fit in a major suit.

 

4♣ is for the deranged. You will get to a major, but may go for your life. If four of a major is makeable partner will often look for slam.

 

3♠ is a compromise. It loses the penalty double, and only brings one major into the picture, unless of course you are going to bid the other one. On balance, I think double is best. I will pass 3, 4 and 3NT. If partner bids 5 I will look at the tournament schedule to see what event I can play in tomorrow. 3♠ is a solid 2nd choice.

 

What do you bid over 3NT?

 

I think over 3NT pass is definitely right. It is looking like RHO has good holdings in both majors. If so he may double. Even with a fit, I don’t expect to make it if West doubles. This is exactly what happened in the 2006 Rosenblum Cup semi-finals. At one table South (hands rotated) balanced with 3♠ and converted 3NT to 4 which East doubled. The full deal:

 

 

 ♠ J3
  73
  AQ10642
 ♣ K105

 ♠ 10
  62
  J953
 ♣ AQJ983

Bridge deal

 ♠ A9864
  AQ95
  87
 ♣ 76

 

 ♠ KQ752
  KJ1084
  K
 ♣ 42

 

 

This went down three for +500 for East-West.

 

 

Lessons to Learn

 

1)     West’s 3♣ was your first sign that the hand may be a misfit.

 

2)     Although 3♠ was far from perfect it was a reasonable shot.

 

3)     If deciding among game or slam choices, and you are on uncertain ground, the saying, ‘No double no trouble’ can be very good advice.

 

4)     Bridge is like driving a car, sometimes you step on the gas, sometimes the break, and sometimes neither.

 

 

N-S vul, at IMPs, you hold as South: ♠AKJ8764 A J109 ♣K102

 

W        N         E          S

3       41      5       ?

 

1 Both minors good hand. 4NT would show both minors wih a very good hand.

What do you bid?


 

 

N-S vul, at IMPs, you hold as South: ♠AKJ8764 A J109 ♣K102

 

W        N         E          S

3       41      5       ?

 

What do you bid?

 

1Both minors, good hand. 4NT would show both minors with a very good hand.

 

Well the opponents have used the vulnerability effectively to make you guess at a high level. The first decision is to decide whether you want to settle for a small slam, or commit to a grand. Let me be clear – the decision rests solely on your shoulders. It is not possible, in the space available, to enlist partner’s cooperation. Go for the grand.

 

It is very, very unlikely partner does not have what you need to make seven. In this type of auction, when there are two possible trump suits, and there has been no trump suit agreement, a bid of five no-trump asks partner to pick a suit. However, if a suit has previously been agree upon, then 5NT would be the grand slam force. At the six level partner may think you want to play 6NT if you bid it, so to be safe bid 6, asking partner to pick a minor.

 

It is important here, because partner will pick his best suit, or one he has extra length. There may just be 13 top tricks. But if there aren’t you want to use spades as a secondary source of tricks. Sure enough partner has exactly what you expected: ♠53 ♥3 ♦AKQ42 ♣AJ965.If he had held the Q♣ you would have 13 top tricks. But you are in an excellent grand slam, although it is not cold. How would you play it?? How are you hoping trumps split?

 

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

Thinking….

 

 

 

As unusual as it sounds, you want trumps to split 4-1. Why? If trumps split 4-1 with West having the shortness, the chances that spades split 3-2 go from average to excellent!  You simply pull trumps, and play for spades to be 3-2. If they are 3-2 you have 13 tricks. If not you must guess the club.  If West has four spades he is 4-7-1-1 shape you need him to have a singleton club queen. If East has four spades you have a sure thing West is marked with 1-7-1-4 shape. Cash the K♣ and play the 10♣ finessing on the 2nd round.

 

On the actual deal West has two diamonds. Essentially you are cold if spades are 3-2. Win the heart lead and play two top trumps. If trumps split 3-2 pull the 3rd trump (West pitches a heart) and play ♠AK. If all follow, claim. If West has ♠Qxxx, he has 4-7-2-0 shape (assuming hearts are 7-4). Ruff a spade, J♣ finessing, club to the ten, cash the K ♣ ruff another spade with your last trump and claim.

 

Finally if East has four spades, then West has 3 clubs, and you can do no better than finessing him for the club queen. The full deal from an online match from last week:

 

 

 ♠ 53
 ♥ 3
 ♦ AKQ42
 ♣ AJ965

 ♠ 10
 ♥ KQ98765
 ♦ 53
 ♣ Q83

Bridge deal

 ♠ Q942
 ♥ J1042
 ♦ 876
 ♣ 74

 

 ♠ AKJ876
 ♥ A
 ♦ J109
 ♣ K102

 

 

 

 

Lessons to Learn

 

1.      If there are two (or three) suits bid in a slam try auction, but no sure fit, a bid of 5NT asks the other partner to pick a slam.

 

2.      If possible try to avoid unusual bids that your partnerships has not previously encountered, such as 6NT on this auction. HOWEVER, make sure you discuss it later on.

 

3.      Over a major suit preempt I like to play leaping Michaels. Here a bid of four of a minor shows 5-5 in that minor and the other major. Hence the cuebid here being for the minors.

 

4.      If the opponents jam you, try to envision what partner has and bid accordingly. Sometimes you can’t ask for key cards.

 

 

Intended audience: Intermediate and up

 

E-W vul, matchpoints, as south you hold: ♠AQ10765432 - J2 ♣Q4

 

West

North

East

South

-

-

1

?

 

 

 

 

 

What do you bid?


Here is a hand from the Dec 11th Bridge from the Bridge at the Centre game. There is something about holding such a hand that makes you all warm inside:

 

·        Nine card suit

·        Your suit is spades

·        It is favourable vulnerability

 

So now we want to maximize our chances for a good score. First the range of tricks we can expect at a spade contract is unusually high. If partner has values only in hearts you may make as little as 6 or 7 tricks. However opposite ♠Jxx xxxxx Ax ♣AJ10 you are on a finesse for a grand slam!

 

The way to find out is to overcall 1♠. This will not get passed out and you start to learn something about the other three hands at the table. It goes pass, pass to East who rebids his diamonds.

 

Well we learned that West doesn’t have a negative double, or a good hand. North also has a poorish hand, at least for spades (not a shock). East has – diamonds. Bid 2♠. Game could still easily make, but three may be too high.

 

Not surprisingly, the third round of bidding is a like an old movie – pass, pass, 3!

 

Well our strategy is working. West and South have more of the same, as does East. As do you. Bid 3♠. You expect to be able to make this contract. If East continues to bid you will pass and allow partner to voice his opinion. He will have a very good idea what everyone has, and should get the decision right.

 

However, it goes all pass. Here is the full deal and auction:

 

 

 

♠ 9
♥ A K 7 2
♦ 7 5
♣ J 10 8 7 6 3

♠ K 8
♥ 10 9 8 5 3
♦ 9 8 6 
♣ K 9 5

   Bridge deal

♠ J
♥ Q J 6 4  
♦ A K Q 10 4 3
♣ A 2

 

♠ A Q 10 7 6 5 4 3 2
♥ -
♦ J 2
♣ Q 4

 

 

West

North

East

South

-

-

1

1♠

  P

  P

  2

2♠

           P                    P                  3                   3♠

     All Pass

 

The defence was accurate and I went down one. I was disappointed but still hoped a good score. Not to be as -50 was under average. Even though E-W can make 3NT they can never it play it there. Plus at most tables they found their heart fit which will make at most ten tricks but often only nine if the declarer gets careless.

 

There were a couple of a bidding errors made:

 

1.West has enough for a negative double over 1♠.

 

2.East has a very good offensive hand, but also one rich in high cards and good for defence. The way to show such a hand is to double at his second turn. Failure to double denies such a hand.

An analogous situation is this auction:

 

West

North

East

South

-

-

-

1

  P

  1NT

  Dbl

3

South shows a strong defensive hand by redoubling at his second turn. When he doesn’t do it he doesn’t have it! A 3♦ bid on the above auction could be made with something like ♠AJ xxxx AQJ10xxx ♣x

 

 

3.North bid well. He wasn’t invited to the party, and knew that partner had a hand like this, and wasn’t asked for an opinion.

 

 

Season Wishes

 

I hope you continue to find value and learn from the series of articles on bidding that I have been writing on behalf of the Unit for a number of years. I will be back in January for more of the same!

 

I also hope to have my third and final book on Bidding Judgement published in 2015.

 

May you have a safe New Years, and may Canada finally get another gold at the World Junior Hockey Championship.

 

Questions or comments may be sent to me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subcategories

Both vul, IMPs at IMPs scoring you hold as south: ♠A K93 AK106 ♣AK1063

 

 

 

What do you open?

 

 

 

NOTE:Just to let you know my new book, The Right Bid at the Right Time is has been released and is available for purchase.

 

Here is a hand from a recent match between two tops teams in the Canadian Online Teams Championship. Sitting South was a so-called expert. He decided to open 2NT.

 

Yes, this is close to the right point count. Yes, this simplifies the auction. Yes, this is one of the worse bids I have seen from a high caliber player.

 

Yes, that is unfortunately true. Time and time again I see players showing notrump shape with singletons. (Haven’t seen it with a void yet!) This is lazy bidding. First your auction is easier, but inaccurate. Natural bidding will be beat notrump auctions 9 times out of 10. Another reason players do this is that they can all but guarantee they will be declarer. What that has to do with Partnership Bridge, I am not sure.

 

The best bid is 1♣. One bids are up to 21 HCPs. That is what you have. Having said that the only reason I open 1♣ is that your suits are the minors, which are notorious difficult to describe when you have to start at the two level. Better to open 1♣ and make a one round force with 2♦. You can still force to game.

 

This hand is VERY good. Much better than your high card will indicate. Much better than a 2NT opener. Give partner ♠xxxx ♥Qx ♦Qxxxx ♣xx and 6♣ is an excellent contract.

 

Back to what happened at the table? South got his just desserts in my view. The full deal:

 

 

 

♠ Q108764
♥ A65
♦ 53
♣ Q2

♠ KJ932
♥ QJ10
♦ 82
♣ J94

Bridge deal

♠ 5
♥ 8742
♦ QJ974
♣ 875

 

♠ A
♥ K93
♦ AK106
♣ AK1063

 

 

North transferred into 4♠, down one when declarer’s play matched his bidding.

 

 

 

Questions or comments may be sent to me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.